Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0496

reference
161-tree-1
name
0496
tree-preservation-order

undefined

161-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.005294 50.853883)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.005223 50.853875,-1.005226 50.853889,-1.005236 50.853902,-1.005251 50.853912,-1.005271 50.853919,-1.005293 50.853921,-1.005315 50.853919,-1.005335 50.853913,-1.005351 50.853903,-1.005361 50.853890,-1.005365 50.853877,-1.005362 50.853863,-1.005352 50.853850,-1.005336 50.853840,-1.005317 50.853833,-1.005295 50.853831,-1.005273 50.853833,-1.005253 50.853839,-1.005237 50.853849,-1.005227 50.853862,-1.005223 50.853875)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL